Skip to content

Gradle vs. Maven: Which Build Tool for Java Projects?

Published on Aug 18, 2025 | approx. 4 min read |

In the Java ecosystem, there are two dominant build tools: Maven and Gradle. Both manage dependencies, compile code, run tests, and produce deployable artifacts. For PHP developers, Composer is the closest comparison — but Maven and Gradle do significantly more than Composer: they are full-fledged build systems.

Maven: Declarative and Convention-Based

Maven was introduced in 2004 and remains widely used today. It is based on the principle of "Convention over Configuration" — if you follow the standard directory structure, there is very little to configure.

pom.xml — The Heart of the Project

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 ...">

    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
    <groupId>com.example</groupId>
    <artifactId>my-app</artifactId>
    <version>1.0.0</version>
    <packaging>jar</packaging>

    <properties>
        <java.version>21</java.version>
        <spring-boot.version>3.2.0</spring-boot.version>
    </properties>

    <parent>
        <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
        <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
        <version>3.2.0</version>
    </parent>

    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
            <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
            <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-data-jpa</artifactId>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
            <artifactId>junit-jupiter</artifactId>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>

    <build>
        <plugins>
            <plugin>
                <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
                <artifactId>spring-boot-maven-plugin</artifactId>
            </plugin>
        </plugins>
    </build>
</project>

Maven Build Lifecycle

Maven uses a fixed lifecycle with phases:

validate → compile → test → package → verify → install → deploy

Common commands:

./mvnw compile          # Compile only
./mvnw test             # Run tests
./mvnw package          # Create JAR/WAR (does not skip tests)
./mvnw package -DskipTests  # JAR without tests
./mvnw spring-boot:run  # Start the application
./mvnw dependency:tree  # Display dependency tree

Maven Advantages

  • Widely adopted: Huge ecosystem, nearly all Java libraries have Maven coordinates
  • Stable conventions: Every Java developer knows the standard directory structure
  • Reproducible: XML is declarative, no imperative code in build scripts
  • IDE support: Excellent integration with IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, NetBeans
  • BOM (Bill of Materials): Centrally managed dependency versions

Maven Disadvantages

  • Verbose XML: For more complex customisations, the pom.xml quickly becomes unwieldy
  • Performance: No incremental builds, no build cache (without plugins like Develocity)
  • Extensibility: Custom logic requires Maven plugins, which are costly to develop

Gradle: Programmatic and Flexible

Gradle was introduced in 2012 and has significantly surpassed Maven in performance and flexibility. Android projects use Gradle exclusively; in the Spring ecosystem, it is the second choice alongside Maven.

build.gradle (Groovy DSL)

plugins {
    id 'java'
    id 'org.springframework.boot' version '3.2.0'
    id 'io.spring.dependency-management' version '1.1.4'
}

group = 'com.example'
version = '1.0.0'

java {
    sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_21
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web'
    implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa'
    runtimeOnly 'org.postgresql:postgresql'
    testImplementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test'
}

test {
    useJUnitPlatform()
}

build.gradle.kts (Kotlin DSL — Recommended for New Projects)

plugins {
    java
    id("org.springframework.boot") version "3.2.0"
    id("io.spring.dependency-management") version "1.1.4"
}

group = "com.example"
version = "1.0.0"

java {
    sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_21
}

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web")
    implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa")
    runtimeOnly("org.postgresql:postgresql")
    testImplementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test")
}

tasks.test {
    useJUnitPlatform()
}

Gradle Build Commands

./gradlew compileJava        # Compile
./gradlew test               # Tests
./gradlew bootJar            # Spring Boot JAR
./gradlew bootRun            # Start the application
./gradlew dependencies       # Dependency tree
./gradlew tasks              # All available tasks

Gradle Advantages

  • Performance: Incremental builds (only changed files are rebuilt), build cache
  • Flexibility: Write custom tasks in Groovy/Kotlin — no plugin development required
  • Multi-project builds: Excellent support for monorepos with many subprojects
  • Parallelisation: Tasks can be executed in parallel

Gradle Disadvantages

  • Learning curve: The Groovy/Kotlin DSL is more powerful but initially harder to understand than XML
  • Build script complexity: With freedom comes responsibility — Gradle builds can become hard to follow
  • Debugging: Problems in build scripts can sometimes be harder to diagnose

Direct Comparison

Criterion Maven Gradle
Configuration language XML (declarative) Groovy/Kotlin DSL
Performance Slow (no cache) Fast (incremental + cache)
Conventions Very strong Present, but flexible
Learning curve Low Medium
Flexibility Limited Very high
Android Not supported Official build tool
IDE support Very good Very good
Community Huge, stable Large, growing
Spring Boot Default option Second option

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Maven if:

  • The team has no experience with Gradle and wants to get started quickly
  • Consistency and conventions are more important than flexibility
  • The project is a standard Spring Boot application without special build requirements

Choose Gradle if:

  • Android development is involved (mandatory)
  • Large monorepos or multi-module projects are being built
  • Build performance is a concern (large codebase, many tests)
  • Custom build logic is needed (custom tasks, code generation, asset processing)

Conclusion

For typical Spring Boot projects, Maven is the safe, battle-tested choice. If you need more control over the build process, work in a monorepo, or want to optimise build performance, you should choose Gradle — especially with the Kotlin DSL, which enables type-safe build scripts.

Thomas Wunner

Thomas Wunner

Certified IT specialist for application development with an instructor qualification and over 14 years of experience building scalable web applications with Symfony and Shopware. When not coding, Thomas volunteers as a lifeguard with the Wasserwacht, performs as a DJ, and explores the countryside on his motorbike.

Comments

Comments are provided by Remark42. By loading comments, data is transmitted to our comment server.